As Tom once said, it is now time to own my own reading log. Why? Despite all the reasons mentioned on Tom’s post, I also got bored of Goodreads and I ended up not using it as much as I should have.
With university, work and… life… I stop reading as much as I did before. But it’s now time to get back to some reading. Even if it’s not that much, I need to read something. I must do it.
At my reads, you can visualize my reading logs: basically, it’s just a big list of ‘I want to read X’, ‘I finished reading Y’ or ‘I am now reading Z’. I will be primarily using the indiebookclub service for now to create this kind of posts.
On my books, you can find my bookshelf of the books I have read in the past. Of course, you won’t be able to find all the books I’ve read. That list’s missing at least three hundred comic books I have in my hometown. I know, that’s a lot.
The bookshelf page is based on the logs from my reading logs. I think I will also add a want to read shelf and currently reading shelf. However, that will be a little challenging for me. I know how to do it. However, I don’t know if that’s the best way to do it.
Right now, I’m just filtering the books by the reading status. But then, once I start using this, I will have the same book on multiple statuses. How do I know if I’m in the last status? I’m thinking about the simplest solution possible:
When adding a new status for a book, change the previous status and add a tag such as #noshelf and then, when building the page, I would know which ones I should add or not to the page.
In other thoughts, I’m storing the files as much as microformats-like possible. However, I’m getting strongly cumbersome files. Just look at this:
categories: - reads date: 2020-01-29T23:19:58.372Z properties: category: &ref_0 - story - classic read-of: - properties: author: - Lewis Carroll name: - Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass uid: - “isbn:9781853260025” type: - h-cite read-status: - to-read tags: *ref_0
I am making an effort to try to save everything the closest to the microformats spec as possible. And that increases the templates complexity and makes the file harder to read.
There’s a spec for a minimal version of microformats called jf2 which looks promising. Perhaps I’ll try doing that. The previous example could be compressed to something like:
Or if you don't know what a response is, you can always write a webmention comment (you don't need to know what that is).